Cause there is a third party you can blame if you cannot hold what the leaks predictTo me it’s pretty obvious that those are „controlled leaks“ with EA/Dice and Tom working together. Both of them benefit and the Information is basically vague marketing talk. But it sounds more „credible“ if someone is „leaking“ it instead of them saying it outright.
It's easy to say thatIf someone can prove his leaks are untrue then he'll donate to a charity of their choice
I agree with the graphics alot, I feel that a semi competive shooter like battlefield needs graphics like BF4 has. I feel like bf1/5 graphics should be in single player games and not in shooters.Whatever BF 6 will be I hope for some basic stuff to be improved (I’ve aired some suggestions here before):
No jets/helicopters built like tanks and with unlimited ammo/flares i.e. mid-air refill.
No ”sniper’s heaven” maps in which you spawn and die, spawn and die etc.
It should be possible to run the game (without going nuts) on medium graphic settings with a decent pc.
Demolition: a 50 ton tank should be able to, well, act like a 50 ton tank and not be stopped by flimsy objects.
All vehicles/jets etc. should, if hit, gradually lose functions and should need repairs by an engineer or return to base to become 100% functional again.
Similarly for soldiers vs medics.
Better e.g. more balanced maps.
No OP weapons.
And lastly (and this may not be related to the game itself): the agonizing ”I shot my foe with at least 10 bullets from behind and he turns around seemingly unhurt and kills me instantly”…