I laughed also when jackfrags said "maybe a release with no bugs"sadly its from jackfrags. he is a pro EA lobbyist. lol when i hear or read that, i am getting already pissed because we had this on every battelfield release before...."all the destruction and vehicle and weapon combat the franchise is know for and elevated it to another level..."
yes, this frenchise is know for that every bf release was shit, nothing works, features missed, totally destructable world ( was announced for bf1 or bf5 too and never happened lol ). so next level means, it will even more shit as before??? lol
so still all marketing blablabla from jack include the presumption about the higher player count. the current saying is "...and more player as ever before....". in normal speach translated: " we tried to bring it up to 128 player but this is still not working, so we not announcing this anymore and saying more player as ever ( current playercount is 72,5 lol but we hope it will get up to 73 soon )"
still missing all the important stuff this game is needing....
Hopefully they will anounce aome more Infos in the official bf6 Release info in spring. So we will see if they are going into the right direction. But atm i just see shit for console Player but nothing what save the future for Clanplayer and clans.
Some interesting leaks/rumors about BF6:
Wasnt firestorm made by different company? I have to check this.they wanna NOT do the firestorm was the dumbest add they did to BF5 and probably partly the reason the game shot down prematurely for support cause they had spend way too long on the map design for firestorm lol
hehe lets hope they got to run it themselves this time lol xDWasnt firestorm made by different company? I have to check this.
Edit: Yup it was made by criterion games.
They killed bf5 with the launch stupiditues and and the EA boss sayong dont buy it. And of course lack of updates, fixes etc.
Edit 2: I mean firestorm wasnt away from the main dev team.
I will shut uo now (sorry)
The Pacific expansion was actually amazing and I really enjoyed playing that. Storming Iwo Jima felt great and made me realize how being able to play these historic and well known battles in a WW2 game is essential for the experience. But instead of Normandy, Berlin, Stalingrad, Okinawa, Ardennes we got.....some farm houses, Norway, a Church and a bad Metro impression.Havent they cancelled bf 5 mainly for low sales?
Wasn't it roughly in the time of Mass effect andromeda?
(Just in case you dont know: They released the game unfinished - fans were dissapointed and instead of adding content in a nice but empty world they just stopped all developement but bugfixing)
EA just cancels AAA games for not being top sales tier.
word AK i enjoyed the game too but seriously Robot arms and 1500 customizations doesnt fit with the game, itld be better off running it like they did in Bf1942, i for one was disappointed how badly they F***Ed up lolThe Pacific expansion was actually amazing and I really enjoyed playing that. Storming Iwo Jima felt great and made me realize how being able to play these historic and well known battles in a WW2 game is essential for the experience. But instead of Normandy, Berlin, Stalingrad, Okinawa, Ardennes we got.....some farm houses, Norway, a Church and a bad Metro impression.
Nevertheless I still think they could have pulled BFV around with a good Eastern Front expansion. But instead of that, they introduced the TTK changes which killed half they playerbase, released a half-assed Battle Royale Mode and then abandoned the game with what felt like 75% of all promises unfulfilled. The focus on player customization was also, in my opinion, a complete waste of time. I don’t care how my character looks since it’s a FPS and I don’t even see my character except for when he‘s dead.
I also prefer to pay 10-15€ per Expansion or pay for Premium and get some good and polished expansions instead of the stupid battlepass system filled with unnecessary and half-assed crap.
We are in the wrong businesses.
Writing stuff about BF6 and Apple and other stuff is easy. Just make stuff up but sound like you know what you are talking about, have about a nano parsec of the truth that someone else also mentions and then write about 2,000 words on BF1 and BFV but without actually saying anything.
a parsec is (3,0857 * 10^16)km and nano means one to the power of a billion(for british and 1 to the power of a milliard to the rest)
so a nano parsec is 30857000km or 103 ligthseconds
I think a lot of trueth can be told in that distance
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.